Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Evading Reality With British Climatologists

“I don’t think there is anything in those e-mails that supports any view that I have been trying to pervert the peer review process . . .”


Professor Jones admitted to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee yesterday that he had “written some very awful e-mails”, including one in which he rejected a request for information on the ground that the person receiving it might criticise his work.

What, pray tell, could be considered more of a perversion of the peer review process?


No comments: